Activity
From 11 Oct 2016 to 09 Nov 2016
07 Nov 2016
-
18:23 Feature #962 (In Progress): General verbose mode?
- Here is another idea (perhaps not so very KISS).
*NOTE* see my revision in note 10
At the start of a fn in whic... -
- I was thinking of having a *single* global variable for controlling verbosity, rather than many different names for d...
-
14:50 Feature #962: General verbose mode?
- For the specific case you mentioned:
in MinPoly.C set... -
- A possible design would be to have a global variable containing the verbosity level; so this would presumably be gove...
-
- Sometimes it could be helpful to have a verbose mode to understand what is happening inside a long computation (_e.g....
-
- Might it make sense to have a general "verbose" mechanism for CoCoALib?
(in addition to the specific one for Groebne... -
- What exactly does multiplicity do?
I made the mistake of trying to compute @multiplicity(I)@ instead of @multiplic... -
- Renamed @AreGensSquareFreeMonomial@ into @AreGensSqFreeMonomial@.
Added to CoCoA-5 (with doc) and to obsolescent.C... -
- I have renamed *@IsRadical@* (for @PPMonoidElem@)to *@IsSqFree@*. The old fn has been moved to @obsolescent.C@ (see ...
-
- This was resolved a year ago. I have just performed the test suggested in comment 1, and there are no warnings (the ...
05 Nov 2016
-
- Also added *@doc/txt/obsolescent.txt@* (with relevant changes to the index files).
Perhaps Anna could check what ...
04 Nov 2016
-
- Added @test-obsolescent.C@, @ex-obsolescent.C@ and added doc to @GlobalManager.txt@.
-
- Thanks, Anna! :-)
Checked in.
I did apparently lie slightly: the user has to add the include directive *and* a... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> Is it really too much to ask the user to add just one line to their file: *@#include "CoCoA/obs... -
- I really do not like the idea of including obsolescent fns by default: in what sense would they be obsolescent?
Is... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> Perhaps we do not need any preprocessor flag. What about the following approach?
>
> The fi... -
- Perhaps we do not need any preprocessor flag. What about the following approach?
The file *@library.H@* does not ...
03 Nov 2016
-
- I prefer not to have so many preprocessor flags. We do need 1 to make the contents of @obsolescent.H@ visible/invisi...
-
- John Abbott wrote:
> My preference is that obsolescent fns remain invisible by default; the user must do something t... -
- I have checkedin the relevant files. The new files are called *@obsolescent.H@* and *@obsolescent.C@*.
CoCoALib i... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> I have a first implementation (but called the file @obsolete.C@ since I find "obsolete" easier ... -
- I have a first implementation (but called the file @obsolete.C@ since I find "obsolete" easier to type than "obsolesc...
-
- John Abbott wrote:
> Here are some ideas about how we might achieve a reasonable design:
> * obsolete/obsolescent f... -
- Currently @ReducedGBasis@ is implemented in CoCoA_5.
Add it to CoCoALib, and add the flag @HasReducedGBasis@.
Suppo...
02 Nov 2016
-
- Here are some ideas about how we might achieve a reasonable design:
* obsolete/obsolescent fns go into 2 files @obso... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> *NOTE* the special fn for PPs is still called *@IsRadical@*; should we rename it?
yes, pleas... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> I believe I have fixed the SEGV bug. Checked in new version of @DUPFp.C@. @Anna: could you ch... -
- I believe I have fixed the SEGV bug. Checked in new version of @DUPFp.C@. @Anna: could you check? :-)
*NOTE* p... -
- Reducing the example. These give segv:...
-
- While comparing various implementations of radical(0-dim) I found this, unexpected for me:
@IsSqFree@ is quite fast ... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> Do you plan to add @MultiplicityQuot@ and @DimQuot@ to CoCoA-5?
> If one computes @dim(P/I)@, ... -
- Do you plan to add @MultiplicityQuot@ and @DimQuot@ to CoCoA-5?
If one computes @dim(P/I)@, does that actually creat... -
- Even though I invented it, I do not much like the name *@TidyGens@*...
Also, it is not clear to me how to deal wit... -
- Also implemented the member function @IHaveGBasis@
-
- I implemented it.
It took a remarkably long time mostly for choosing the name and deciding where to put it.
In fact...
27 Oct 2016
-
- Done. Still need documentation.
-
- @multiplicity@ and @dim@ are implemented in cocoa-5.
Bring them to cocoalib.
The names should be *@MultiplicityQu... -
- I am still puzzled about how best to handle the trivial cases (0x0 and 1x1 matrices).
The relevant code is only 2 ... -
- The problem was simply that the generic Bariess code failed (on the very last line) when given a 0x0 matrix.
I hav... -
- The following triggers a SEGV:...
-
- I have added a test (which revealed issue #956).
I would check in, but EduRoam is being more than usually obstructiv... -
- Perhaps the function is not that widely usable, but it was handy for something I was doing, so I made it publicly ava...
-
- Write a new function which produces random unimodular matrices of integers.
-
- How to know if the GBasis has already been computed? there is a member flag (myGBasisIsValid), but we should have a ...
-
- What is the status of this issue?
I believe the code is there (and presumably has been active for some time).
-
- It make sense for the ordering matrices to be over @ZZ@; for @IdentityMat@ it is useful to be able to specify the rin...
26 Oct 2016
-
- In CoCoA-5 we have @obsolescent.cpkg5@, a package with all the functions declared obsolescent, for example if they ha...
25 Oct 2016
-
- While testing @IsSqFree@ I observed that CoCoALib is very slow at computing @gcd(f,f')@ where @f = (x^2+1)*(x^27-x)@ ...
-
- I have checked in code for the new fn *@IsSqFree@* (incl. tests and doc).
It is not complete:
* currently gives e...
24 Oct 2016
-
- A function which tests whether a value is square-free is probably going to be quite similar to a function which deter...
-
- Currently there is a function called @IsRadical(PP)@ for a PPMonoidElem.
Should it be called @IsSquareFree@?
"A n... -
- Write function IsSquareFree (or IsSqFr, or IsSqFree) for a RingElem
-
- I like the idea of a fn @IsSqFree@; it certainly could be faster than testing equality with the radical (and also cle...
-
- After spending some time thinking and writing, I realized that we would need a
@IsSqFree(f)@ which could be consider... -
- After some more reading, it seems that the usual structure is @QQ(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n)[u1, u2,...]@ where the expressi...
21 Oct 2016
-
- I think there could be problems with removing indets by giving them values: if there is an embedded 0-dim component t...
-
- Does that mean that you are in favour of offering the user the choice between a fast (and probably correct) answer, o...
-
- @ProbSmoothFactor@?
or @SmoothFactor(n)@ and @SmoothFactor(n, "NoProb")@?
20 Oct 2016
-
- I can make @factor@ and @SmoothFactor@ for integers faster in some cases by calling @IsProbPrime@.
The risk is that ... -
- Checked in the code. Also two new tests @test-NumTheory6@ and @test-SparsePolyRing3@.
No documentation yet.
Name... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> Currently I have used *@radical@* in CoCoALib, and *@rad@* in CoCoA-5 (to avoid a clash with th... -
- Before checking in which name should I use?
Currently I have used *@radical@* in CoCoALib, and *@rad@* in CoCoA-5 ... -
- I have an implementation in CoCoALib. It took so long because of a "mysterious bug" in @ContentFreeFactor@.
My cu... -
- The ctor args for a @DifferentialAlgebra@ are the following:
* *@n@* number of "independent variables"
* *@k@* numb...
19 Oct 2016
-
- Some of Erika's people would like this to be in CoCoALib sooner rather than later!
18 Oct 2016
-
- (from SC^2)
We could (easily?) implement a function doing an incremental GBasis: if I has GBasis GB, and we add a po... -
- John Abbott wrote:
> I wonder if a probabilistic approach could work. If the ideal is 0-dim, the speed is adequate.... -
- I wonder if a probabilistic approach could work. If the ideal is 0-dim, the speed is adequate. If not, perhaps we c...
-
- The crude idea was just to run the usual code for computing the radical, and if at some point we determine with certa...
-
- Apart from 0-dim (already implemented), and monomial, how can you determine it?
-
- There is now "IsRadical" for 0-dimensional ideals. (and it's in our paper in progress ;-)
I've just realized I forg... -
- Werner and Mario ask whether it could make sense to have an @IsRadical@ function for ideals; can this be determined s...
-
- This would be quite useful. For the time being should we just add...
13 Oct 2016
-
- Thanks John! Now we have only the "16bytes"...
12 Oct 2016
-
- I'll do @test-OrderedRing2@.... there is a leak in twinfloat.
I know where it is; now I just have to find a nice way... -
- Anna Maria Bigatti wrote:
> First run of valgrind (I had to reinstall valgrind on my mac...)
> [...]
The "16-byt... -
- First run of valgrind (I had to reinstall valgrind on my mac...)...
-
-
- John Abbott wrote:
> Add also to check whether the CoCoA-5 tests pass with @BackwardCompatible.cpkg5@
OK, moved i... -
- Add also to check whether the CoCoA-5 tests pass with @BackwardCompatible.cpkg5@
-
- Everything related to making a CoCoALib release:
# Redmine Roadmap: close or postpone issue
# Redmine Release iss...
Also available in: Atom