Project

General

Profile

Support #944

Release: CoCoALib-0.99550 (together with CoCoA-5.2.0)

Added by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Anna Maria Bigatti
Category:
Tidying
Target version:
CoCoALib-0.99550 spring 2017
Start date:
08 Apr 2014
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
5.11 h
Spent time:
5.10 h

Description

Everything related to making a CoCoALib release:

  1. Redmine Roadmap: close or postpone issue
  2. Redmine Release issues: check percentages, check timings
  3. Finalize
  4. make veryclean; make (full make, with all tests and examples and CoCoA-5..)
  5. tests: make valgrind
  6. CoCoA-5: make ManExamples
  7. create snapshot
  8. upload examples
  9. upload manual
  10. update webpage
  11. publish manual (arXiv? ResearchGate?)
  12. close release on Redmine

--> send message to facebook page

Related issues

Related to CoCoA-5 - Support #851: Release: CoCoA-5.2.0Closed2014-08-01

Related to CoCoALib - Feature #298: Valgrind: keep CoCoALib at 0 memory leaksClosed2013-01-28

Copied from CoCoALib - Support #754: Release: CoCoALib-0.99538 (together with CoCoA-5.1.2)Closed2014-04-08

Copied to CoCoALib - Support #1056: Release: CoCoALib-0.99560 (together with CoCoA-5.2.2)Closed2014-04-08

History

#1 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

  • Copied from Support #754: Release: CoCoALib-0.99538 (together with CoCoA-5.1.2) added

#2 Updated by John Abbott over 7 years ago

Add also to check whether the CoCoA-5 tests pass with BackwardCompatible.cpkg5

#4 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from Release: CoCoALib-0.99544 (together with CoCoA-5.1.4) to Release: CoCoALib-0.99544 (together with CoCoA-5.1.6)

#5 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

John Abbott wrote:

Add also to check whether the CoCoA-5 tests pass with BackwardCompatible.cpkg5

OK, moved it to #850

#6 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to In Progress

#7 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

  • Target version set to CoCoALib-0.99550 spring 2017

#8 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

#10 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

First run of valgrind (I had to reinstall valgrind on my mac...)

 --test-BigInt3 
==87351==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-bug5 
==87397==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-bug7 
==87405==    definitely lost: 20,496 bytes in 513 blocks
 --test-DenseUPolyRing1 
==87413==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-IsInteger1 
==87489==    definitely lost: 880 bytes in 33 blocks
 --test-MachineInt1 
==87493==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-NumTheory1 
==87558==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-OrderedDomain2 
==87592==    definitely lost: 1,128,528 bytes in 24,893 blocks
 --test-RandomSource2 
==87636==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RandomSource3 
==87643==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingElem2 
==87663==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingElem4 
==87671==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingElem5 
==87695==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingHom1 
==87710==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingTwinFloat4 
==87743==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingTwinFloat5 
==87748==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingZmodN1 
==87760==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-symbol1 
==87799==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-utils1 
==87831==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks

#11 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

  • Related to Feature #298: Valgrind: keep CoCoALib at 0 memory leaks added

#12 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

Anna Maria Bigatti wrote:

First run of valgrind (I had to reinstall valgrind on my mac...)
[...]

The "16-byte leak" seems related to throwing/catching errors: is independent of the number of throws/catches and number of error values.

Now I investigate the others.

#13 Updated by John Abbott over 7 years ago

I'll do test-OrderedRing2.... there is a leak in twinfloat.
I know where it is; now I just have to find a nice way of avoiding it.

#14 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 7 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 30

Thanks John! Now we have only the "16bytes" 

 --test-BigInt3 
==90655==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-bug5 
==90709==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-bug7 
==90717==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-DenseUPolyRing1 
==90725==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-IsInteger1 
==90801==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-MachineInt1 
==90805==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-NumTheory1 
==90863==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-OrderedDomain2 
==90899==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RandomSource2 
==90939==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RandomSource3 
==90945==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingElem2 
==90967==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingElem4 
==90975==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingElem5 
==90982==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingHom1 
==91016==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingTwinFloat4 
==91044==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingTwinFloat5 
==91048==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-RingZmodN1 
==91060==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-symbol1 
==91092==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks
 --test-utils1 
==91128==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 1 blocks

#15 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from Release: CoCoALib-0.99544 (together with CoCoA-5.1.6) to Release: CoCoALib-0.99550 (together with CoCoA-5.1.6)

#16 Updated by John Abbott about 7 years ago

  • % Done changed from 30 to 40

I am hoping this can be completed very soon (within a week?).

I have just run make valgrind in src/tests/ and all programs were clean :-)
[the reports for test-hilbert1 and test-GFan1 were slightly odd: "0 bytes leaked"]

ADDENDUM also make valgrind for the examples says all programs are clean :-)

Just remember that the corresponding CoCoA-5 version is 5.2.0 (not 5.1.6 as in the title!)

#17 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from Release: CoCoALib-0.99550 (together with CoCoA-5.1.6) to Release: CoCoALib-0.99550 (together with CoCoA-5.2.0)
  • Description updated (diff)
  • % Done changed from 40 to 50

#18 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#19 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#20 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

  • Copied to Support #1056: Release: CoCoALib-0.99560 (together with CoCoA-5.2.2) added

#21 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

uploaded release, manual and examples

#22 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

  • % Done changed from 50 to 90

updated web page

#23 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

published manual on ResearchGate

#24 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed
  • % Done changed from 90 to 100
  • Estimated time changed from 4.00 h to 5.11 h

Also available in: Atom PDF