Activity
From 05 Sep 2018 to 04 Oct 2018
29 Sep 2018
-
12:51 Design #1223 (Resolved): NewPolyRing default indet names
- Removed the doc. Moved the old fns into obsolescent.
28 Sep 2018
-
20:36 Design #1223: NewPolyRing default indet names
- Just to remember.
This should go into obsolescent. -
18:05 Design #1223: NewPolyRing default indet names
- I have updated the code: sources, tests and examples.
Everything compiles, and the tests pass (after changing some e... -
14:57 Design #1223: NewPolyRing default indet names
- John Abbott wrote:
> Do you prefer *(A)* or *(B)* ? Opinions?
I prefer A, as I had already explained.
-
14:51 Design #1223: NewPolyRing default indet names
- I see two possible actions:
*(A)* remove completely the pseudo-ctor which accepts just the number of indets; the cal...
21 Sep 2018
-
16:17 Feature #1227: exgcd; solve Bezout equation
- Maybe restricting the problem to just 2 args is too limiting?
Consider the following 3 multivariate polynomials: @...
19 Sep 2018
-
14:23 Feature #1227: exgcd; solve Bezout equation
- According to Wikipedia there are Bezout domains which are not PIDs (but it seems all such non PIDs are "funny rings" ...
-
14:13 Feature #1227 (New): exgcd; solve Bezout equation
- I'd like to use an *@exgcd@* function: one which calculates both the GCD and the corresponding linear combination of ...
06 Sep 2018
-
16:17 Design #1225: Move to C++14 (skipping C++11)
- Here is a list of "upgrades" to make to our source:
* make appropriate changes so that *@std::move@* can be used
* ... -
16:10 Design #1225: Move to C++14 (skipping C++11)
- Maintaining backward compatibility with pre-2011 C++ is probably fairly pointless, and is causing problems with users...
-
16:07 Design #1225 (In Progress): Move to C++14 (skipping C++11)
- Revise the source to use C++14 (and avoid "deprecated" features).
Also available in: Atom