Activity
From 29 Aug 2018 to 27 Sep 2018
21 Sep 2018
- 16:17 Feature #1227: exgcd; solve Bezout equation
- Maybe restricting the problem to just 2 args is too limiting?
Consider the following 3 multivariate polynomials: @...
19 Sep 2018
- 14:23 Feature #1227: exgcd; solve Bezout equation
- According to Wikipedia there are Bezout domains which are not PIDs (but it seems all such non PIDs are "funny rings" ...
- 14:13 Feature #1227 (New): exgcd; solve Bezout equation
- I'd like to use an *@exgcd@* function: one which calculates both the GCD and the corresponding linear combination of ...
06 Sep 2018
- 16:17 Design #1225: Move to C++14 (skipping C++11)
- Here is a list of "upgrades" to make to our source:
* make appropriate changes so that *@std::move@* can be used
* ... - 16:10 Design #1225: Move to C++14 (skipping C++11)
- Maintaining backward compatibility with pre-2011 C++ is probably fairly pointless, and is causing problems with users...
- 16:07 Design #1225 (In Progress): Move to C++14 (skipping C++11)
- Revise the source to use C++14 (and avoid "deprecated" features).
04 Sep 2018
- 14:33 Design #1223: NewPolyRing default indet names
- We first had this "friendly" pseudo constructor because the syntax for indet names was tedious.
Now we have @SymbolR...
02 Sep 2018
- 21:41 Design #1223 (In Progress): NewPolyRing default indet names
- The problem arises in a call to *@Hom_P_Px@* which creates a new polyring by calling *@NewPolyRing@* specifying only ...
- 21:35 Design #1223: NewPolyRing default indet names
- The problem was originally communicated to JAA via email. The following is a failing example:...
- 21:32 Design #1223 (Closed): NewPolyRing default indet names
- Currently @NewPolyRing@ may be called specifying just the number of indets (but not their names).
Currently the name...
Also available in: Atom