Activity
From 22 Jun 2016 to 21 Jul 2016
21 Jul 2016
- 16:40 1.00 hour (Feature #910 (Closed): BigRat: read from a string in "decimal" format?)
- Checked in
- 15:36 1.00 hour (Feature #910 (Closed): BigRat: read from a string in "decimal" format?)
- First impl
- 13:42 0.25 hour (Feature #910 (Closed): BigRat: read from a string in "decimal" format?)
- Exact format?
- 13:27 1.50 hour (Feature #910 (Closed): BigRat: read from a string in "decimal" format?)
- Some notes
19 Jul 2016
- 22:44 0.10 hour (Feature #565 (In Progress): FloatApprox for TwinFloat values?)
- Name?
- 14:30 0.25 hour (Feature #565 (In Progress): FloatApprox for TwinFloat values?)
- Rigid "correctness" vs convenience
- 14:24 0.20 hour (Feature #910 (Closed): BigRat: read from a string in "decimal" format?)
- Some notes
07 Jul 2016
- 13:51 0.20 hour (Bug #905 (Closed): txt2tags: double quotes wrong in LaTeX)
- Probably not hard to fix
30 Jun 2016
- 13:59 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Still perplexed
29 Jun 2016
- 17:54 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Perhaps?
- 17:42 0.15 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Quick question
- 17:35 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Question
- 15:35 0.25 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- testing
- 15:32 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Oh dear!
- 15:18 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Move enum?
- 15:15 1.00 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Checked in
- 15:01 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Possible but awkward
- 12:42 0.75 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- First impl
28 Jun 2016
- 19:41 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Yet another proposal for the interface
27 Jun 2016
- 22:41 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- More ideas
- 17:26 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Alternative fn name?
- 17:20 0.75 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Doc was already updated
- 14:05 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Looking at the code
- 13:17 0.20 hour (Feature #898 (In Progress): New function: cardinality of finite field?)
- Names
- 11:41 0.20 hour (Feature #898 (In Progress): New function: cardinality of finite field?)
- Just change a name?
- 11:03 0.20 hour (Feature #898 (In Progress): New function: cardinality of finite field?)
- Not enthusiastic
- 09:11 8.00 hours (Feature #902 (Closed): New function: FrobeniusMat)
- implemented
- 08:55 4.00 hours (Feature #899 (Closed): IsMaximal, IsPrimary for IDEAL (in cocoalib))
- 08:48 2.00 hours (Feature #107 (Closed): Recognizing finite fields)
25 Jun 2016
- 21:54 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Backward compatibility
- 19:02 0.25 hour (Bug #860 (Closed): Check impl of RingTwinFloatImpl::myIsRational)
- Feedback
- 16:40 0.20 hour (Feature #896 (In Progress): myIsEqual, myCmp: direct comparisons between RingElem and MachineInt, BigInt and BigRat?)
- Mild inconsistency?
- 14:33 0.20 hour (Feature #896 (In Progress): myIsEqual, myCmp: direct comparisons between RingElem and MachineInt, BigInt and BigRat?)
- List of new mem fns
- 14:28 0.25 hour (Feature #896 (In Progress): myIsEqual, myCmp: direct comparisons between RingElem and MachineInt, BigInt and BigRat?)
- Pros and cons
- 14:11 0.40 hour (Design #859 (Closed): Twin-float: comparisons and equality test)
- Added doc
- 12:19 0.30 hour (Bug #853 (Closed): NearestInt can needlessly throw InsufficientPrecision)
- Closing
- 12:08 0.50 hour (Bug #858 (Closed): floor for TwinFloat can produce ERR::SERIOUS)
- No problems after 3 months in feedback
- 11:40 0.20 hour (Bug #895 (Closed): NumDigits: sometimes gives wrong answer)
- Speed test
24 Jun 2016
- 16:53 0.25 hour (Bug #895 (Closed): NumDigits: sometimes gives wrong answer)
- Visible in CoCoA-5?
- 16:26 0.25 hour (Bug #895 (Closed): NumDigits: sometimes gives wrong answer)
- Some notes
22 Jun 2016
Also available in: Atom