Activity
From 05 Jun 2016 to 04 Jul 2016
30 Jun 2016
- 13:59 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Still perplexed
29 Jun 2016
- 17:54 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Perhaps?
- 17:42 0.15 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Quick question
- 17:35 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Question
- 15:35 0.25 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- testing
- 15:32 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Oh dear!
- 15:18 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Move enum?
- 15:15 1.00 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Checked in
- 15:01 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Possible but awkward
- 12:42 0.75 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- First impl
28 Jun 2016
- 19:41 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Yet another proposal for the interface
27 Jun 2016
- 22:41 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- More ideas
- 17:26 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Alternative fn name?
- 17:20 0.75 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Doc was already updated
- 14:05 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Looking at the code
- 13:17 0.20 hour (Feature #898 (In Progress): New function: cardinality of finite field?)
- Names
- 11:41 0.20 hour (Feature #898 (In Progress): New function: cardinality of finite field?)
- Just change a name?
- 11:03 0.20 hour (Feature #898 (In Progress): New function: cardinality of finite field?)
- Not enthusiastic
- 09:11 8.00 hours (Feature #902 (Closed): New function: FrobeniusMat)
- implemented
- 08:55 4.00 hours (Feature #899 (Closed): IsMaximal, IsPrimary for IDEAL (in cocoalib))
- 08:48 2.00 hours (Feature #107 (Closed): Recognizing finite fields)
25 Jun 2016
- 21:54 0.10 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Backward compatibility
- 19:02 0.25 hour (Bug #860 (Closed): Check impl of RingTwinFloatImpl::myIsRational)
- Feedback
- 16:40 0.20 hour (Feature #896 (In Progress): myIsEqual, myCmp: direct comparisons between RingElem and MachineInt, BigInt and BigRat?)
- Mild inconsistency?
- 14:33 0.20 hour (Feature #896 (In Progress): myIsEqual, myCmp: direct comparisons between RingElem and MachineInt, BigInt and BigRat?)
- List of new mem fns
- 14:28 0.25 hour (Feature #896 (In Progress): myIsEqual, myCmp: direct comparisons between RingElem and MachineInt, BigInt and BigRat?)
- Pros and cons
- 14:11 0.40 hour (Design #859 (Closed): Twin-float: comparisons and equality test)
- Added doc
- 12:19 0.30 hour (Bug #853 (Closed): NearestInt can needlessly throw InsufficientPrecision)
- Closing
- 12:08 0.50 hour (Bug #858 (Closed): floor for TwinFloat can produce ERR::SERIOUS)
- No problems after 3 months in feedback
- 11:40 0.20 hour (Bug #895 (Closed): NumDigits: sometimes gives wrong answer)
- Speed test
24 Jun 2016
- 16:53 0.25 hour (Bug #895 (Closed): NumDigits: sometimes gives wrong answer)
- Visible in CoCoA-5?
- 16:26 0.25 hour (Bug #895 (Closed): NumDigits: sometimes gives wrong answer)
- Some notes
22 Jun 2016
- 16:15 1.00 hour (Design #891 (Closed): Replace auto_ptr in preparation for C++11?)
- KISS
- 13:26 0.10 hour (Design #891 (Closed): Replace auto_ptr in preparation for C++11?)
- Emacs note
- 13:24 1.00 hour (Design #891 (Closed): Replace auto_ptr in preparation for C++11?)
- Mostly OK
21 Jun 2016
- 14:37 0.30 hour (Feature #873 (In Progress): bool3: add some logical operations?)
- Not being clever
- 14:17 0.50 hour (Feature #873 (In Progress): bool3: add some logical operations?)
- Not so easy
- 13:12 0.30 hour (Design #891 (Closed): Replace auto_ptr in preparation for C++11?)
- Files
20 Jun 2016
- 14:58 3.00 hours (Design #849 (In Progress): Cleanup MinPoly code)
- code into C++ (Bigatti+Palezzato)
17 Jun 2016
- 22:24 0.10 hour (Design #891 (Closed): Replace auto_ptr in preparation for C++11?)
- Quick test
- 22:23 0.50 hour (Design #891 (Closed): Replace auto_ptr in preparation for C++11?)
- Not the first to find the problem
- 15:51 0.25 hour (Feature #357 (Rejected): Constructor for vectors? CoCoAVector)
16 Jun 2016
- 17:18 0.10 hour (Design #827 (Closed): NewPositiveMat also for matrices over QQ? Also NewIntegerOrdMat. (now called MakeTermOrd))
- Status?
- 17:14 0.20 hour (Bug #814 (Closed): PPOrdering: matrix ordering, what rings are allowed.)
- And the answer is...
- 17:09 0.20 hour (Feature #800 (Closed): PPMonoidSparse: impl of sparse PPs)
- When to use sparse PPs?
- 17:03 0.20 hour (Design #789 (Closed): NumTheory: behaviour of InvMod when inverse does not exist)
- Another possibility
15 Jun 2016
- 14:35 0.25 hour (Bug #547 (New): elim using RingTwinFloat triggers error "SERIOUS")
- Still troublesome
13 Jun 2016
- 20:40 0.50 hour (Feature #889 (Closed): configure script: give summary of warnings at end)
- First impl
- 20:35 0.20 hour (Feature #759 (Closed): Configuration: where to keep source for test compilations?)
- Some notes
- 15:32 0.25 hour (Bug #593 (Closed): Temporary directories used during configuration)
- Using /tmp
- 11:39 0.30 hour (Bug #593 (Closed): Temporary directories used during configuration)
- Use system temporary filesystem
- 14:11 0.25 hour (Bug #867 (Closed): Compilation Error: C++11 and old GMP-Version)
- Evolved into another issue
10 Jun 2016
- 17:21 0.25 hour (Bug #756 (Closed): frobby (v0.9.0) does not compile with g++-4.8)
- Use old standard?
- 16:55 0.50 hour (Bug #756 (Closed): frobby (v0.9.0) does not compile with g++-4.8)
- Not familiar
- 16:50 0.25 hour (Bug #756 (Closed): frobby (v0.9.0) does not compile with g++-4.8)
- 16:09 0.25 hour (Bug #756 (Closed): frobby (v0.9.0) does not compile with g++-4.8)
- Modified doc
06 Jun 2016
- 13:31 0.20 hour (Support #887 (Closed): My first compilations with clang)
- Compilation guides
- 13:28 0.25 hour (Support #887 (Closed): My first compilations with clang)
- RingFqLog and RingFqVec
Also available in: Atom