Activity
From 09 Dec 2019 to 07 Jan 2020
07 Jan 2020
-
21:59 Bug #1383: NewPolyRing on MS Windows
- In any case we should add an example like this as a new "official" test.
-
- JAA says the bug is not present on current internal version of CoCoA-5 compiled and running on Linux.
The error me... -
- Bernhard Andraschko reports that the following causes a crash on MS Windows 10 Pro (10.0.17763)...
-
- * Perhaps arrange for the last few (1, 2, 3?) messages sent to the CoCoA mailing list to be easily accessible from th...
-
- Here is a list of things to do (mostly references to other issues):
* fix SEGV bug (#1382)
* look at #1375 and #137... -
- This issue is to gather things to do during John's visit.
-
- What should @IsIndetPosPower(x/x)@ give?
Error or @false@?
I expected @false@ but actually got an error.
-
- There is no manual page for @IsIndetPosPower@.
-
- Here is the output from @valgrind@:...
-
- I ran @valgrind@ on @CoCoAInterpreter@ taking input from @/dev/null@ (_i.e._ empty input).
The resulting report sa... -
- Here is a session sample:...
-
- What should @SymbolRange@ do if there are no indets in the range?
What should @NewPolyRing@ do if the result of @Sy... -
- I was using CoCoA-5 to look for some examples to show the students. It was a surprise when it SEGV'd :-(
-
- I get a SEGV with the following input (no SEGV if the number of loop iters is 100)....
17 Dec 2019
-
- I have changed *@configure@* so that it sets a flag saying whether to build the Qt GUI; this is determined by a comma...
16 Dec 2019
-
- Ulrich reported that the GUI fails to compile now that we are using *@nullptr@*.
I had a quick search online, and fo...
12 Dec 2019
-
- As reported in the previous comment, example 1 was still a problem. I increased the extra time (to 2.5s), then the c...
-
- After the change mentioned in issue #1375, the examples in comment 13 are now satisfactorily quick. The example in c...
11 Dec 2019
-
17:40 Slug #948: radical is slow (compared to singular) on these examples
- Anna Maria Bigatti wrote:
> John Abbott wrote:
> > My simple idea was just to add say 0.1 to the actual measured ti...
09 Dec 2019
-
- John Abbott wrote:
> I am inclined to say that there is not much point in writing any tests for @power@. What do yo... -
- I am inclined to say that there is not much point in writing any tests for @power@. What do you think?
-
- John Abbott wrote:
> If you are convinced that my approach is better, then, yes, please undo your CVS update.
ok
... -
- Should the function be documented?
If so, we should probably state that it exists just to increase compatibility b... -
- If you are convinced that my approach is better, then, yes, please undo your CVS update.
I am not certain whether ... -
- ooops, we overlapped and made incompatible changes.
But I think you had a better idea.
Should I undo my cvs?
-
- I have just checked in a @power@ function defined in @cocolib.cpkg5@.
My approach means that @power@ works for any t... -
- Implemented for RingElem (in OneLiners)
-
- In CoCoA we can write @g^4@, but in CoCoALib we have to write @power(g,4)@ (because of incompatible priority of @oper...
Also available in: Atom