Support #696
test-OrderedRing: activate or eliminate?
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Safety
Target version:
Description
There is a file test-OrderedRing1.C which is not actually executed.
Either fix it so that it works (currently fails with InsufficientPrecision) and ensure that it is called, or eliminate it.
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by John Abbott almost 9 years ago
Updated by - Subject changed from test-OrderingRing: activate or eliminate? to test-OrderedRing: activate or eliminate?
#2
Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 8 years ago
Updated by I don't see it in cvs.
#3
Updated by John Abbott about 8 years ago
- Assignee set to John Abbott
I'll try to fix it and add it to CVS.
#4
Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 8 years ago
- Target version changed from CoCoALib-0.99540 Feb 2016 to CoCoALib-0.99550 spring 2017
#5
Updated by John Abbott about 8 years ago
- Related to Bug #853: NearestInt can needlessly throw InsufficientPrecision added
#6
Updated by John Abbott about 8 years ago
Well, this test is worthwhile: it has found a bug in the impl of NearestInt (see #853).
#7
Updated by John Abbott about 8 years ago
I have now checked in 2 new tests for ordered domains: test-OrderedDomain1 and test-OrderedDomain2. The first test is for ZZ and QQ, while the second is for twin-floats. The tests are very similar, but the twin-float version must handle InsuffPrec.
#8
Updated by John Abbott about 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
- % Done changed from 0 to 90
The tests pass, of course.
#9
Updated by John Abbott about 8 years ago
- Related to Feature #857: floor, ceil, and NearestInt for RingElem in CoCoA-5? added
#10
Updated by John Abbott almost 8 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
- % Done changed from 90 to 100
#11
Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 7 years ago
- Estimated time set to 3.01 h