Design #410
New file: BigRatOps
Description
Should BigRat
be split into the type defn and a separate BigRatOps
?
Why is IntOperations
not called BigIntOps
?
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti over 10 years ago
- Target version set to CoCoALib-0.99532
#2 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 10 years ago
- Target version changed from CoCoALib-0.99532 to CoCoALib-0.99533 Easter14
#3 Updated by John Abbott almost 10 years ago
- Target version changed from CoCoALib-0.99533 Easter14 to CoCoALib-0.99534 Seoul14
#4 Updated by John Abbott over 9 years ago
- Target version changed from CoCoALib-0.99534 Seoul14 to CoCoALib-1.0
#5 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 6 years ago
- Related to Support #847: Doc for BigInt, BigIntOps, BigRat -- should there be BigRatOps? added
#6 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 6 years ago
- Related to Design #1145: File names, coding conventions: Fns, Ops, Operations? part 2 added
#7 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 6 years ago
- Subject changed from BigRatOperations? to New file: BigRatOps
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Target version changed from CoCoALib-1.0 to CoCoALib-0.99600
- % Done changed from 0 to 10
#8 Updated by John Abbott almost 6 years ago
- Assignee set to John Abbott
- % Done changed from 10 to 90
I have split the sources (or did Anna do it?). Updated the doc, and all other files.
#9 Updated by John Abbott over 5 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
- % Done changed from 90 to 100
- Estimated time set to 0.22 h