Design #1721
Verbose messages: print level?
Description
Discussion:
Should a verbose message indicate at what level it first appears?
Context:SetVerbosityLevel(99);
produced a lot more output than I wanted, but I am too
lazy to search through doc (or the source code) to find out what level triggers
the many messages I do not want. If the message indicated that it appears at or
above level 80 (say), then I can simply try level 79.
2023-03 Also added indentation for depth of call D
see below: #1721.7
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by John Abbott about 1 year ago
Does anyone have any comments? Better ideas?
#2 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
Yes!!! That's a great idea!
It would be impossibile to keep the documentation up to date... and tedious to read.
#3 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 20
Proposed look (invented numbers) [depth:level] space space
NewOrdvArith(ord)[3:40] -- called -- MinPolyQuotDef[3:60] time cycle: --> 7e-05 MinPolyQuotDef[3:50] Total time --> 5.1e-05
intead of current
[depth]: space
NewOrdvArith(ord)[3]: -- called -- MinPolyQuotDef[3]: time cycle: --> 7e-05 MinPolyQuotDef[3]: Total time --> 5.1e-05
#4 Updated by John Abbott about 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
I wonder whether the format you propose is too terse, but then making it longer perhaps produces too much output?
Not so convinced by the colon... perhaps I just need to get used to it. [3:40]
looks like a time to me!
What about [depth @ level]? Then it would look like:
NewOrdvArith(ord)[3@40] -- called -- MinPolyQuotDef[3@60] time cycle: --> 7e-05 MinPolyQuotDef[3@50] Total time --> 5.1e-05
Mmmm, not sure it is really any better. Other suggestions? Possibly [depth v level] e.g. [3v40]
Maybe using the "pipe" (vertical bar) symbol: [3|40]
So it would look like this:
NewOrdvArith(ord)[3|40] -- called -- MinPolyQuotDef[3|60] time cycle: --> 7e-05 MinPolyQuotDef[3|50] Total time --> 5.1e-05
Anna
Any chance you could implement this change over the next week (while I'm absent)?
#5 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- % Done changed from 20 to 30
John Abbott wrote:
What about D depth - L level e.g. D3-L40
NewOrdvArith(ord) D3-L40 -- called -- MinPolyQuotDef D3-L60 time cycle: --> 7e-05 MinPolyQuotDef D3-L50 Total time --> 5.1e-05
Anna
Any chance you could implement this change over the next week (while I'm absent)?
I'll try tomorrow
#6 Updated by John Abbott about 1 year ago
I Tjink I might prefer to info to be inside (square?) brackets:
something like this:
NewOrdvArith(ord) [D3-L40] -- called -- MinPolyQuotDef [D3-L60] time cycle: --> 7e-05 MinPolyQuotDef [D3-L50] Total time --> 5.1e-05
Or conceivably even like this:
[D3-L40] NewOrdvArith(ord) -- called -- [D3-L60] MinPolyQuotDef time cycle: --> 7e-05 [D3-L50] MinPolyQuotDef Total time --> 5.1e-05
Try a few ideas and see what you think is nicest to read.
#7 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- Assignee set to Anna Maria Bigatti
- % Done changed from 30 to 90
You insipired me: I chose this look because this is how I've always desired the indentation for depth!
Reference: file verbose.C
, function VerboseLog::operator()(long level)
/**/ SetVerbosityLevel(95); /**/ use R ::= QQ[x,y,z]; /**/ I := ideal(x^2-1, y^2-2, z^3); /**/ IsRadical(I); [D1,L20,myTestIsRadical_0dim] trying z [D2,L80,MinPolyModular] 1: prime is 1073741831 [D3,L90,MinPolyQuotDef] time cycle: --> 7.4e-05 [D3,L90,MinPolyQuotDef] Total time --> 5.7e-05 time: p*f --> 6e-06 time: NF --> 2.2e-05 time: coefficients --> 1.1e-05 time: LinDepMill --> 1.8e-05 Post-cycle --> 1.6e-05 [D2,L80,MinPolyModular] 2: prime is 1073741833 [D3,L90,MinPolyQuotDef] time cycle: --> 7e-05 [D3,L90,MinPolyQuotDef] Total time --> 5.2e-05 time: p*f --> 8e-06 time: NF --> 2.1e-05 time: coefficients --> 8e-06 time: LinDepMill --> 1.5e-05 Post-cycle --> 1.5e-05 [D2,L90,MinPolyModular] Reconstruction time: 3.8e-05 [D2,L90,MinPolyModular] Verification-QQ time:7.7e-05 false
#8 Updated by John Abbott about 1 year ago
That looks nice! I have increased to two 2 spaces after the close square bracket.
#9 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- Related to Feature #1731: Verbosity level in CoCoA5 added
#10 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- Description updated (diff)
#11 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- Description updated (diff)
#12 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- Description updated (diff)
#13 Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
- % Done changed from 90 to 100
#14 Updated by John Abbott 5 months ago
- Related to Design #1768: Limit indentation in verbose mesgs? added