Project

General

Profile

Activity

From 06 Aug 2022 to 04 Sep 2022

22 Aug 2022

17:29 Feature #1694 (Resolved): New expv/exponents function?
I have implemented the changes proposed in comment 4.
It all compiles, and all tests pass.
I'll check in soon.
John Abbott
16:01 Feature #1694: New expv/exponents function?
After discussing with Anna, we think the following redesign is a good solution:
* change existing @exponents@ so tha...
John Abbott
15:34 Feature #1694 (In Progress): New expv/exponents function?
Bruns replied by email (2022-08-09):... John Abbott

09 Aug 2022

12:14 Feature #1694: New expv/exponents function?
Another way to solve Bruns's problem would be to allow @PushBack@ to accept PPs from a different monoid,
and then ma...
John Abbott
12:06 Feature #1694: New expv/exponents function?
I have been discussing with Bruns over email. He wanted to write something like... John Abbott
11:57 Feature #1694 (Closed): New expv/exponents function?
Consider whether to implement a simpler fn for computing the expv of a PP.
Currently one must do:...
John Abbott

08 Aug 2022

20:41 Feature #1210 (Closed): New Fn: make public "coefficients" (of poly wrt a given PP basis)
I have opted for the KISS solution -- we can make fancier versions in the future is there is need for them!
I have c...
John Abbott
20:16 Slug #1680 (Closed): FloorLog2 or SizeInBase?
After discussion with Anna we have decided that @SizeInBase@ is obsolete; so the original question here is no longer ... John Abbott
20:08 Feature #1684 (Closed): RandomNBitPrime - new fn
This was completed about 2 months ago. There is even doc!
Not sure how one could test it: perhaps range check and I...
John Abbott
20:04 Feature #1488: BuiltIn Interreduce-Function
Anna! Please document and close this issue!
John Abbott
20:01 Feature #1466 (Closed): Ops += *= etc for Matrices?
As in previous comment it seems best to accept the KISS solution, and dedicate our efforts elsewhere (more important).
John Abbott
19:56 Feature #718: Insert calls to CheckForInterrupt
Nico Mexis asked whether there could be a check for interrupts inside the factorizer.
This will much easier to achie...
John Abbott
19:48 Design #1693 (Resolved): SizeInBase: obsolete
Anna agreed.
I have moved the code to @obsolete.H@ and @obsolete.C@ (from BigIntOps@).
All tests pass.
John Abbott
19:47 Design #1693 (Closed): SizeInBase: obsolete
I think *@SizeInBase@* is not really useful (cannot think of any situation).
Also it can easily be implemented by ca...
John Abbott
 

Also available in: Atom