Activity
From 11 Mar 2015 to 09 Apr 2015
09 Apr 2015
- 21:46 CoCoALib Feature #678: Accumulator (like a geobucket)
- Note: perhaps also consider the design of C++ @std::accumulate@? Is there anything in BOOST?
My (vague) idea is t... - 21:36 CoCoALib Feature #678: Accumulator (like a geobucket)
- I have just written @DetDirect@ which computes the sum of many terms (one for each permutation). In order to get dec...
- 21:30 CoCoALib Feature #678 (In Progress): Accumulator (like a geobucket)
- Consider creating a general "accumulator" for ring elems, a sort of generalization of a geobucket.
02 Apr 2015
- 17:55 CoCoA-5 Support #677 (New): Credits to CoCoA-5 contributors
- If we want (and we want) to attract contributions we need to find a proper way to give them credits for their work, a...
- 17:53 CoCoALib Support #676 (In Progress): Credits to CoCoALib contributors
- If we want (and we want) to attract contributions we need to find a proper way to give them credits for their work, a...
28 Mar 2015
- 09:18 CoCoALib Slug #675: Matrix determinant over multivariate poly ring
- In my specific instance the direct algorithm (as alternating sum of products) would be best.
The problem with mult... - 09:16 CoCoALib Slug #675 (In Progress): Matrix determinant over multivariate poly ring
- CoCoA can be too slow and require too much RAM for computing determinant of a matrix of multivariate polynomials.
...
26 Mar 2015
- 11:53 CoCoALib Bug #15: Adjoint of a non-invertible matrix
- I am planning to implement a direct algorithm: each entry in the @adj@ is just a determinant, and each determinant is...
25 Mar 2015
- 15:59 CoCoALib Bug #15: Adjoint of a non-invertible matrix
- Even @AdjByDetOfMinors@ takes too long for a 6x6 matrix of distinct indets. Why?
*2015-03-26 NOTE* I think the prob... - 15:22 CoCoALib Bug #15: Adjoint of a non-invertible matrix
- @adj@ is a very simple function: it chooses between @AdjByDetOfMinors@ and @AdjByInverse@.
What do you think @AdjB... - 14:52 CoCoALib Bug #15 (In Progress): Adjoint of a non-invertible matrix
- I do not recall when, but @adj@ has aleady been added to CoCoALib.
It has a *VERY BAD SLUG*: even after several mi...
13 Mar 2015
- 14:50 CoCoA-5 Feature #674: Ring constructor: allow empty range for indices?
- John Abbott wrote:
> I understand your point.
> Actually, I suppose the correct solution is to use anonymous ind... - 14:35 CoCoA-5 Feature #674 (In Progress): Ring constructor: allow empty range for indices?
- I understand your point. Actually, I suppose the correct solution is to use anonymous indets for the dummies, but we...
- 13:56 CoCoA-5 Feature #674: Ring constructor: allow empty range for indices?
- John Abbott wrote:
> There would be no technical problem allowing a range such as 1..0; perhaps the main question is... - 13:21 CoCoA-5 Feature #674: Ring constructor: allow empty range for indices?
- There would be no technical problem allowing a range such as 1..0; perhaps the main question is whether the gain in e...
- 11:08 CoCoA-5 Feature #674 (Rejected): Ring constructor: allow empty range for indices?
- I am writing a CoCoA-5 program which may need some "dummy" variables. My code looks like this:...
- 13:55 CoCoA-5 Support #654 (Feedback): Rename adjoint to adjugate???
- After speaking to Anna about it on Skype, we decided that it is simplest to call the function @adj@ (in the same way ...
11 Mar 2015
- 13:14 CoCoA-5 Feature #673: Error message: I was expecting...
- The relevant source code is @Parser.H:156@
The following rule may help identify the "type" of a parser token:
* s... - 13:10 CoCoA-5 Feature #673 (Closed): Error message: I was expecting...
- The generic error message...
- 13:07 CoCoA-5 Design #668: Remove keyword "weights"?
- It works... more or less. @A["weights"]@ gives the error I wanted, but @A.weights@ still gives a less helpful error....
Also available in: Atom