Activity
From 14 Jan 2021 to 12 Feb 2021
12 Feb 2021
-
12:19 0.40 hour (Bug #724 (Closed): RationalSolve: wrongly complains about non zero-dim even in finite char)
- Mmmm
-
12:16 0.20 hour (Feature #723 (New): Referring to indets with multiple indices from a polyring)
- Slow
-
11:54 0.20 hour (Slug #1270 (Closed): RationalSolve: use MinPolyQuot instead of elim)
- Seems OK now
11 Feb 2021
-
00:13 0.10 hour (Support #1252 (New): ShapeLemma: no manual entry)
- Status?
-
00:12 2.50 hours (Bug #1573 (Closed): ApproxSolve: very imprecise)
- Improved
-
00:08 0.75 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- Implemented
10 Feb 2021
-
21:33 0.20 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- Feedback?
-
21:28 0.60 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- More doubts
-
20:50 0.50 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- Approved
09 Feb 2021
-
15:22 0.50 hour (Bug #727 (In Progress): Emacs UI: send-file (C-c C-f) should check if buffer and file are synchronized)
- Got burned
05 Feb 2021
-
15:41 0.20 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- Return value
04 Feb 2021
-
21:05 1.75 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- Some progress
03 Feb 2021
-
17:48 0.25 hour (Bug #1574 (New): ApproxSolveTF)
- Some notes
-
17:26 0.25 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- Not so clever?
31 Jan 2021
-
10:43 0.10 hour (Bug #1216 (Closed): RationalSolve: gives wrong answer)
- Another example
30 Jan 2021
-
20:17 0.50 hour (Bug #1573 (Closed): ApproxSolve: very imprecise)
- Some notes
29 Jan 2021
-
12:05 0.15 hour (Design #1520 (Closed): Replace BOOST_FOREACH by new C++14 range for syntax)
-
12:03 0.20 hour (Feature #1516 (Closed): substring function)
22 Jan 2021
-
10:49 0.20 hour (Design #1151 (Closed): ConcatList or ConcatLists)
-
09:52 0.10 hour (Feature #531 (Closed): Package protected variables should know which package protected them)
- Almost redundant?
-
08:44 0.20 hour (Feature #531 (Closed): Package protected variables should know which package protected them)
-
08:31 0.20 hour (Feature #1174 (Closed): package of a function --> of an identifier!)
-
08:24 0.30 hour (Feature #346 (Closed): Describe should indicate package name)
21 Jan 2021
-
15:16 0.50 hour (Bug #1567 (Closed): Radical in non-zero char)
- Found and fixed
15 Jan 2021
-
21:05 0.20 hour (Design #1546 (Closed): Improve 'describe' or 'print' for a function)
- Seems OK now
-
20:56 0.10 hour (Feature #346 (Closed): Describe should indicate package name)
- Revision
-
20:52 0.50 hour (Feature #346 (Closed): Describe should indicate package name)
- Some notes
-
09:13 0.10 hour (Feature #346 (Closed): Describe should indicate package name)
- Now possible?
-
20:42 0.30 hour (Feature #531 (Closed): Package protected variables should know which package protected them)
- John's notes
-
12:23 0.20 hour (Feature #531 (Closed): Package protected variables should know which package protected them)
-
10:30 2.00 hours (Feature #531 (Closed): Package protected variables should know which package protected them)
-
09:07 0.15 hour (Feature #1174 (Closed): package of a function --> of an identifier!)
- KISS?
-
08:29 0.20 hour (Feature #1174 (Closed): package of a function --> of an identifier!)
-
08:11 1.50 hour (Feature #1174 (Closed): package of a function --> of an identifier!)
Also available in: Atom