Feature #173
Anonymous symbols: should they be available in CoCoA-5?
Description
Latest addition in CoCoALib could also be useful in CoCoA-5...
but since symbol
is not a type in CoCoA-5 that could be quite tricky.
History
#1
Updated by John Abbott about 12 years ago
Here are a couple of suggestions which do not require manipulating symbol
directly. If these two fns cover almost all uses then it may be worth implementing them.
We could offer a fn for creating a polyring all of whose indets are "anonymous"; the user simply says how many indets there are.
We could also offer a fn which "extends" an existing polyring by adding (1 or more) anonymous indets to it -- by convention these indets would be the last ones, say.
#2
Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti about 10 years ago
- Target version set to CoCoA-5.1.0 Easter14
#3
Updated by John Abbott about 10 years ago
- Target version changed from CoCoA-5.1.0 Easter14 to CoCoA-5.1.1 Seoul14
#4
Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 10 years ago
Now I'm incline to say "no" and reject the issue: too much hassle for very little use.NewSymbol()/NewSymbols(n)
are very useful at CoCoALib level, but not at CoCoA-5 level.
#5
Updated by Anna Maria Bigatti almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
- Assignee set to Anna Maria Bigatti
#6
Updated by John Abbott almost 10 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 100