Support #1686
Manual entry for random (see also)
Description
Which other fns should be listed in the "see also" section of the manual page for random
?
Bear in mind that there is also the suggestion to use ??
to all NN entries related to "random"
The current situation is confusing.
History
#1 Updated by John Abbott almost 2 years ago
I find it confusing that most-but-not-all "random" functions are listed under "see also".
My current temptation is to reduce the see-also list, and let the user use ??
An advantage is that we do not have to manually update the see-also list whenever
a new random fn is added (something we have clearly forgotten to do in the past).
Comments? Opinions?